<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>computer,review and game &#187; XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chip.revivalx.com/tag/xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chip.revivalx.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tips 7 Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/10/06/tips-7-vistaxp/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/10/06/tips-7-vistaxp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfomance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MINIMIZE MENU LOADING DELAY TIME THROUGH A REGISTRY HACK
By default,both XP and Vista wait 400 milliseconds before presenting expansion menus [those menu items with right-facing triangles on them]. You can eliminate the wait completely for instantaneous menu expansion [though be warned, you may not actually like it]. Note that this will not make, say, you’re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: justify;">MINIMIZE MENU LOADING DELAY TIME THROUGH A REGISTRY HACK</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">By default,both <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista </strong>wait<strong> 400 milliseconds </strong>before presenting expansion menus [those menu items with right-facing triangles on them]. You can eliminate the wait completely for instantaneous menu expansion [though be warned, you may not actually like it]. Note that this will <em>not</em> make, say, you’re your primary <strong>File </strong>or <strong>Edit </strong>menu show up faster-those menus automatically load as fast as possible.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-312"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DO IT </strong>Run <strong>regedit </strong>at the <strong>Run </strong>prompt. Browse to<strong> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Desktop</strong>. Double click the <strong>MenuShowDelay </strong>key in the right-hand pane and set the value to 0.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">DISABLING <strong>Q</strong>O<strong>S</strong> AND <strong>IP</strong>V<strong>6 </strong>OPTIONS WILL IMPROVE BANDWIDTH AND WEB PERFORMANCE</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The theory goes that you should disable any service you aren’t using, and that turning off <strong>IPv6 </strong>and <strong>QoS </strong>Packet Scheduling options in your <strong>NIC </strong>properties will boost browsing speed. One absurb legend holds that <strong>QoS </strong>alone actually “reserves” 20 percent of your bandwidth. Microsoft has formally debunked this tip, and our test back that up: We found zero difference at all in file-transfer speeds whether <strong>QoS </strong>and <strong>IPv6 </strong>options were on or off, on both <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista </strong>systems.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DON’T DO IT</strong></p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">PUTTING YOUR PAGGING FILE ON A SECOND HARD DRIVE WILL IMPROVE PERFORMANCE</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Splitting up the pagefile and your everyday apps is common sense. Doing this allows <strong>Windows </strong>to dump temp junk onto one drive while not having to interrupt reads or writes on the other. If you have two<strong> hard drives</strong>, this is a tip that definitely works and works well: Expect at least a 5 to 10 percent speed boost, depending on the existing speed of your rig and, especially, the <strong>performance </strong>of your drives. But any second drive will help at least a little: While not recommended, you can even put the pagefile on an <strong>external USB drive </strong>and see some <strong>performance </strong>gains.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">CLEANING OUT CACHED AND TEMP FILES IMPROVES PERFORMANCE, ESPECIALLY OF YOUR WEB BROWSER</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Unless you have so much junk on your<strong> hard drive </strong>that you are nearly out of free space, deleting any number of files-whether they’re temp files or permanent ones-won’t improve <strong>performance </strong>at all. The only exceptions to the rule are for programs or processes that involves every file on your drive: <strong>Virus </strong>scans or full disk backups, for examples, are faster if there’s less data to deal with. It make sense to clear this files out using Disk Cleanup every now and then for the sake of good digital hygiene, but you won’t get a <strong>performance </strong>boost for your trouble.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DON’T DO IT</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-319" title="Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Windows Vista" src="http://chip.revivalx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Absolute-Beginners-Guide-to-Microsoft-Windows-Vista.jpg" alt="Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Windows Vista" width="123" height="160" /><br />
</strong></p>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;">
<div style="margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; overflow: auto; width: auto;">
<table id="seolinx-paramtable" style="border: 1px solid gray; margin: 0pt; border-collapse: separate;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://toolbarqueries.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> PR: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Google pagerank" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> I: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Google index" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> L: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Google links" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> LD: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Yahoo linkdomain" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.bing.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> I: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Bing index" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Sitemap.xml" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.semrush.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> Rank: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="SEMRush Rank" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.semrush.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> Traffic: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="SEMRush SE Traffic" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.semrush.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> Price: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="SEMRush SE Traffic price" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> C: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Compete Rank" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0789735768?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0789735768">Absolute Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Microsoft Windows Vista</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0789735768" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/10/06/tips-7-vistaxp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips 6 Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/10/02/tips-6-vistaxp/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/10/02/tips-6-vistaxp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PERFORMANCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOU CAN TWEAK VIRTUAL MEMORY SETTINGS FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE
In the Windows 95/98 era, conventional wisdom held that you should manually set your virtual memory [i.e., pagefile] size to at least 1.5 times the amount of RAM in order to optimize performance. [By default, Windows will manage pagefile on its own: You will likely find the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: justify;">YOU CAN TWEAK VIRTUAL MEMORY SETTINGS FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the <strong>Windows </strong>95/98 era, conventional wisdom held that you should manually set your virtual memory [i.e., pagefile] size to at least 1.5 times the amount of <strong>RAM </strong>in order to optimize <strong>performance</strong>. [By default, <strong>Windows </strong>will manage pagefile on its own: You will likely find the initial pagefile size set to 0.5x or 1x the amount of <strong>RAM </strong>you have]. We were skeptical about this tip, but our benchmarks surprised us: Some systems showed no change at all, but some(particularly older machines) showed substantial improvement beyond the usual random noise we see in benchmark results. We got at least a 10 percent jump after we upped the initial pagefile size to 2x amount or <strong>RAM </strong>on two separate machines. It won’t work for all computers, so the jury’s still out on this one, but because it’s so easy to do and there are no negative consequences, it’s worth a shot just to see if it has any effect.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-289"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DO IT </strong>In the <strong>XP </strong>System Control Panel, click Advanced, then [under <strong>Performance</strong>] click Settings, Advanced. In the Virtual Memory module, click Change. Click Custom size then up both initial and Maximum size to roughly double your amount of <strong>RAM</strong>. Click Set [important!], then OK out of all <strong>windows</strong>. In <strong>Vista</strong>’s, click “Advanced system settings” in the System Control Panel and follow the same instructions.</p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">CLEARING THE PREFETCH DIRECTORY [OR CACHE] WILL IMPROVE STARTUP TIME</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">One of the most notorious <strong>Windows </strong>tips ever is that deleting all the files in the <strong>Windows</strong>/Prefetch directory will cause your system to boot faster. We tested the tip by repeatedly measuring boot times on a trio of both <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista</strong> machines with overstuffed Prefetch folders, then running the same test after clearing the folders out. The result: No improvement in boot time in any of the cases. Some testers have reported that clearing the Prefetch cache actually <em>lengthens </em>boot time, though we didn’t experience this either.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DON’T DO IT</strong></p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">WRITE CACHING WILL IMPROVE PERFORMANCE ON<strong> SATA</strong><strong> </strong>DRIVES</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This feature is disabled by default in <strong>VISTA </strong>because if your computer loses power before a write is completed,you can lose data. If you’re confident in your UP’s capabilities, crank it up and you’ll see at least a 10 percent improvement in <strong>performance</strong>. Remember, write caching is supported only on <strong>SATA </strong>drives. The options are grayed out for older <strong>ATA</strong> disks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DO IT </strong>In Explorer, right-click the drive you want to speed up and select Properties. Click the Hardware tab, select Properties again. Click the Policies tab. Check both of the boxes beneath “Optimize for <strong>performance</strong>.”</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-305" title="Switching to Windows Vista for Seniors_ A Guide Helping Senior Citizens Move From XP to Vista (Computer Books for Seniors series)" src="http://chip.revivalx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Switching-to-Windows-Vista-for-Seniors_-A-Guide-Helping-Senior-Citizens-Move-From-XP-to-Vista-Computer-Books-for-Seniors-series.jpg" alt="Switching to Windows Vista for Seniors_ A Guide Helping Senior Citizens Move From XP to Vista (Computer Books for Seniors series)" width="125" height="160" /></p>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;">
<div style="margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; overflow: auto; width: auto;">
<table id="seolinx-paramtable" style="border: 1px solid gray; margin: 0pt; border-collapse: separate;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://toolbarqueries.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> PR: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Google pagerank" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> I: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Google index" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.google.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> L: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Google links" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> LD: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Yahoo linkdomain" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.bing.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> I: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Bing index" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Sitemap.xml" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.semrush.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> Rank: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="SEMRush Rank" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.semrush.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> Traffic: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="SEMRush SE Traffic" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://www.semrush.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> Price: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="SEMRush SE Traffic price" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
<td style="border: 1px solid gray; padding: 2px; background: #f0f0f0 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; color: darkgreen; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; white-space: nowrap;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/favicon.ico" alt="" width="12" height="12" /> C: <a style="color: blue; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 7pt; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;" title="Compete Rank" href="javascript:{}">wait&#8230;</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999; text-align: justify;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div id="seolinx-tooltip" style="border: 1px solid #000000; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; display: none; opacity: 0.9; position: absolute; width: auto; z-index: 99999;">
<table style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; border-collapse: separate; width: auto;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td id="seolinx-table" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 1px; padding: 0pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11px; font-weight: bold;"></td>
<td id="seolinx-tooltip-close" style="border: 0pt none; margin: 0pt; padding: 1px; cursor: pointer; vertical-align: middle; width: auto;" title="close"><img src="chrome://seoquake/content/skin/close.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/9059050452?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=9059050452">Switching to Windows Vista for Seniors: A Guide Helping Senior Citizens Move From XP to Vista (Computer Books for Seniors series)</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=9059050452" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/10/02/tips-6-vistaxp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips 5 Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/26/tips-5-vistaxp/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/26/tips-5-vistaxp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOU NEED TO OVERWRITE YOUR HAND DRIVE SEVEN TIMES WITH RANDOM DATA TO MAKE DATA UNRECOVERABLE
Conventional wisdom holds that you need to write and rewrite a hard drive numerous times with garbage before it will be totally unrecoverable by forensics experts. That’s not exactly the case: We overwrote a hard drive just once with zeroes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: justify;">YOU NEED TO OVERWRITE YOUR HAND DRIVE SEVEN TIMES WITH RANDOM DATA TO MAKE DATA UNRECOVERABLE</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Conventional wisdom holds that you need to write and rewrite a <strong>hard drive </strong>numerous times with garbage before it will be totally unrecoverable by forensics experts. That’s not exactly the case: We overwrote a hard drive just once with zeroes and asked the recovery gurus at <strong>DriveSavers </strong>if they could rescue it. The answer: They couldn’t save a single bit. Now we don’t pretend to know about the hardcore resources of groups like the <strong>NSA</strong>, so if you’re that paranoid about being branded a terrorist because of a deleted <strong>PDF </strong>of <em><strong>The Anarchist’s Cookbook</strong> </em>discovered on a used drive you bought on <strong>eBay</strong>, by all means, spend a week wiping that drive. But you’re just casually recycling a drive for resale or donation, a single pass will do the trick and will save you literally days of time waiting for the wipe to finish.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DO IT </strong>Run a program like <strong>KillDisk </strong>[<a href="http://www.killdisk.com">www.killdisk.com</a>] and select a single zeroes-only pass.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span id="more-254"></span></p>
<h3 style="text-align: justify;">DISABLING UNUSED NETWORK CONNECTIONS WILL IMPROVE BOOT TIME</h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Say you set up a network drive for a network drive for a computer you had months ago but is no longer on your network: When <strong>Windows </strong>boot, it spends at least some time reconnecting to that drive, wasting precious seconds you could be spending on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=112920601994"><strong>Facebook</strong></a>. While <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista </strong>are better than older versions of <strong>Windows </strong>about network connections [who can forget those interminable “Connecting…’ messages?] it still makes sense to disconnect from network shares you no longer need. You won’t actually boot noticeably faster without those extra drive letters, but Explorer will become usable more quickly after launch. This is especially noticeable in <strong>Vista</strong>, which has a helpful “loading” progress indicator that overlays the address bar: Having any number of network shares will cause it to take any extra 10 to 20 seconds to fully load.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>DO IT </strong>Right-click each shared folder in Explorer and select Disconnect. This will permanently remove them from your drive list unless you map them again.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-260" title="Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Windows Vista" src="http://chip.revivalx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Absolute-Beginners-Guide-to-Microsoft-Windows-Vista.jpg" alt="Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Windows Vista" width="123" height="160" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0789735768?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0789735768">Absolute Beginner&#8217;s Guide to Microsoft Windows Vista</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0789735768" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/26/tips-5-vistaxp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZoneAlarm ForceField</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/25/zonealarm-forcefield/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/25/zonealarm-forcefield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Protects you from threats on the web, but not from yourself
Just surfing the Internet can be enough to infect your system and grant malware uninvited access to your hard drive. But what about the malware that is invited? Malware writers know that the quickest way to infiltrate a system is through the end user, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-229" title="ZoneAlarm ForceField" src="http://chip.revivalx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ZoneAlarm-ForceField.jpg" alt="ZoneAlarm ForceField" width="468" height="335" /></h3>
<h3>Protects you from threats on the web, but not from yourself</h3>
<p>Just surfing the <strong>Internet </strong>can be enough to infect your system and grant malware uninvited access to your hard drive. But what about the <strong>malware </strong>that <em>is</em> invited? <strong>Malware </strong>writers know that the quickest way to infiltrate a system is through the end user, and there’s no shortage of dirty code masquerading under the guise of helpful applications. By the time you realize you’ve been duped, it’s too late, and it’s here that <strong>ForceField </strong>ultimately falls short.</p>
<p><span id="more-226"></span></p>
<p>Like <strong>BufferZone</strong>, <strong>ForceField </strong>protects at the application level, enveloping your web browser in an emulation layer. You’ll know <strong>ForceField</strong>’s working by the green border glowing around your browser. As you surf the web, unsolicited downloads write to a virtual file system, which prevents rogue sites from thrashing the OS. As a second layer of protection, <strong>ForceField </strong>issues a warning whenever you’re about to enter a site known to distribute spyware, at which point you can enter anyway or hightail it to safer corners of the web.</p>
<p>But unlike <strong>BufferZone</strong>, this one-two punch falls far short of providing an impenetrable defense. <strong>ForceField </strong>focuses only on web browsing, leaving email, IM clients, and other connected applications exposed to the same dangers. And while <strong>ForceField </strong>neutralizes unsolicited downloads occurring behind the scenes, it won’t save your system if you accidentally execute a malicious file or willingly install a seemingly innocent application only to find out later it was laced with spyware.</p>
<p><strong>ForceField </strong>was still in beta from during our tests, and we uncovered a few rough edges. Despite support for both <strong>Internet Explorer</strong> and <strong>FireFox</strong>, we initially couldn’t get either browser to load through <strong>Vista</strong>’s start menu; instead, we had to right-click the <strong>ForceField </strong>icon in the taskbar. Several reboots later the problem disappeared. <strong>XP </strong>wasn’t affected, but some applications managed to load unprotected browser windows in both OSes, exposing a major vulnerability.</p>
<p>When we navigated the same shady websites we surfed with <strong>BufferZone</strong>, <strong>ForceField </strong>indentified only some of them as potentially harmful, letting several others slip through undetected. You have to wait while downloaded files undergo a scan for known malware, and we had little success getting <strong>ForceField </strong>to flag files embedded with Trojans and other common cruft. False positives were much less of an issue, but that’s little consolation given the weak detection of real threats.</p>
<p>By limiting virtualization to just automatic downloads made through the browser, <strong>ZoneAlarm </strong>also limits the product’s appeal. In its current form, <strong>ForceField </strong>can’t be counted on to provide a reliable defense. And even though <strong>ForceField </strong>isn’t intended as a stand-alone security application, there’s not enough to it justify a $30 investment.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001AFCJ0S?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=revivproje-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B001AFCJ0S">Zonealarm Forcefield 2008</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B001AFCJ0S" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/25/zonealarm-forcefield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips 4 Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/24/tips-4-vistaxp/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/24/tips-4-vistaxp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
SUPERFETCH BOOSTS PERFORMANCE

Superfetch is an update of the XP Prefetcher, designed to more intelligently load applications into RAM based on frequency of use. With Superfetch on, your PC should theoretically get faster over time, particularly when loading frequently apps. You won’t see improvement in general performance, like rendering Photoshop files, but Superfetch does tend to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>
<p align="center">SUPERFETCH BOOSTS PERFORMANCE</p>
</h3>
<p><strong>Superfetch </strong>is an update of the <strong>XP Prefetcher</strong>, designed to more intelligently load applications into <strong>RAM </strong>based on frequency of use. With <strong>Superfetch </strong>on, your <strong>PC </strong>should theoretically get faster over time, particularly when loading frequently apps. You won’t see improvement in general performance, like rendering <strong>Photoshop </strong>files, but <strong>Superfetch</strong> does tend to make apps load10 to 20 percent more quickly, depending on their size.</p>
<p><span id="more-216"></span></p>
<p><strong>DO IT</strong> <strong>Superfetch </strong>is on by default. To ensure that it’s active, go to the Control Panel, open Administrative Tools, and select Services. Scroll down to <strong>Superfetch </strong>and ensure that it is set to “Started” and “Automatic.”</p>
<h3>
<p align="center">DISABLING<strong> XP’s</strong><strong> </strong>INDEXING SERVICE CAN IMPROVE PERFORMANCE</p>
</h3>
<p>You can almost ignore the question of whether <strong>XP</strong>’s <strong>Indexing Service </strong>slows down your computer. The fact is it doesn’t do much good anyway. Indexing is supposed to help <strong>Windows </strong>keep better tabs on files, but it does a terrible job of it and offers the users no options for configuring what gets indexed. It’s almost beside the point that it can slow your system-sometimes only a little and sometimes to an outright crawl. Even <strong>Microsoft </strong>acknowledges that the <strong>Indexing Services </strong>can cause <strong>hard drives </strong>to thrash and that it “uses lots of pagefile space and lots of <strong>CPU </strong>time”-in fact, <strong>Microsoft </strong>oftens recommends disabling it. Note, however,that <strong>Vista</strong>’s integrated search and indexing system is considerably improved.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT</strong> There are several ways to turn off <strong>XP</strong>’s <strong>Indexing Service</strong>. The most thorough is to open the Control Panel, open Administrative Tools, then open Services. Scroll down to Indexing Services and double-click it. Change the Startup type to “Disabled.”</p>
<h3>
<p align="center">TURNING ON MULTIPLE CORES IN<strong> </strong><strong>VISTA</strong><strong> </strong>IMPROVES BOOT TIME</p>
</h3>
<p>You’ll find an option within <strong>Vista</strong>’s <strong>msconfig </strong>utility that cryptically lets you set the “Number of processors” used during boot. By default it is turned off [with the dropdown set to 1]. We tried upping the setting to 2 on a dual-core system and, guess what, no change in boot time whatsoever. Turns out this is just a debug setting for coders who want to test how programs load on single-core machines without having to physically go to a less-sophisticated PC.it can be completely ignored. By default <strong>Windows </strong>uses all your cores.</p>
<p><strong>DON’T DO IT </strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-224" title="Windows Vista Annoyances- Tips_Secrets_and Hacks" src="http://chip.revivalx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Windows-Vista-Annoyances-Tips_Secrets_and-Hacks.jpg" alt="Windows Vista Annoyances- Tips_Secrets_and Hacks" width="107" height="160" /><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596527624?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0596527624">Windows Vista Annoyances: Tips, Secrets, and Hacks</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0596527624" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/09/24/tips-4-vistaxp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips 3 Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/25/tips-3-vistaxp/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/25/tips-3-vistaxp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PERFORMANCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REGISTRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

WRITE CACHING WILL IMPROVE PERFORMANCE ON SATA DRIVES
This feature is disabled by default in VISTA because if your computer loses power before a write is completed,you can lose data. If you’re confident in your UP’s capabilities, crank it up and you’ll see at least a 10 percent improvement in performance. Remember, write caching is supported [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">WRITE <strong>CACHING </strong>WILL IMPROVE <strong>PERFORMANCE </strong>ON <strong>SATA DRIVES</strong></p>
<p>This feature is disabled by default in <strong>VISTA </strong>because if your <strong>computer </strong>loses <strong>power </strong>before a write is completed,you can lose data. If you’re confident in your UP’s capabilities, crank it up and you’ll see at least a 10 percent improvement in <strong>performance</strong>. Remember, write <strong>caching </strong>is supported only on <strong>SATA </strong>drives. The options are grayed out for older <strong>ATA disks</strong>.</p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span></p>
<p><strong>DO IT </strong>In Explorer, right-click the drive you want to speed up and select Properties. Click the <strong>Hardware </strong>tab, select Properties again. Click the Policies tab. Check both of the boxes beneath “Optimize for <strong>performance</strong>.”</p>
<p align="center">MINIMIZE MENU LOADING DELAY TIME THROUGH A <strong>REGISTRY </strong>HACK</p>
<p>By default,both <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista </strong>wait 400 milliseconds before presenting expansion menus [those menu items with right-facing triangles on them]. You can eliminate the wait completely for instantaneous menu expansion [though be warned, you may not actually like it]. Note that this will <em>not</em> make, say, you’re your primary File or Edit menu show up faster-those menus automatically load as fast as possible.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT </strong>Run <strong>regedit </strong>at the Run prompt. Browse to <strong>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Desktop</strong>. Double click the <strong>MenuShowDelay </strong>key in the right-hand pane and set the value to 0.</p>
<p align="center">CHANGE YOUR DEFAULT ‘VIEW SOURCE’ APPLICATION WITH A REGISTRY HACK</p>
<p>Viewing <strong>web-page</strong> source file in Notepad is hardly a user-friendly experience. You can hack the registry to change which app opens source files, but using <strong>TweakUI </strong>is a better choice.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT </strong>Load <strong>TweakUI </strong>[http://tinyurl.com/553fw6], browse to <strong>Internet Explorer</strong> &gt;View Source. Click Change <strong>Program</strong>… and browse for whatever app you prefer. This only changes the setting for <strong>Internet Explorer</strong>; to change the View Source app for <strong>Firefox</strong>, type <strong>about : config</strong> in the address bar, scroll to view_source.editor. path, and change the setting by pasting in the full path to the application you want to use. [The <strong>Firefox </strong>tip works with XP and <strong>Vista</strong>, but you’ll have to tweak the registry if you want to do the same for <strong>IE </strong>under <strong>Vista</strong>.]</p>
<p align="center">DISABLING <strong>Q</strong>O<strong>S</strong> AND <strong>IP</strong>V<strong>6 </strong>OPTIONS WILL IMPROVE <strong>BANDWIDTH </strong>AND <strong>WEB PERFORMANCE</strong></p>
<p>The theory goes that you should disable any service you aren’t using, and that turning off <strong>IPv6 </strong>and <strong>QoS </strong>Packet Scheduling options in your <strong>NIC </strong>properties will boost browsing speed. One absurb legend holds that <strong>QoS </strong>alone actually “reserves” 20 percent of your <strong>bandwidth</strong>. Microsoft has formally debunked this tip, and our test back that up: We found zero difference at all in file-transfer speeds whether <strong>QoS </strong>and <strong>IPv6 </strong>options were on or off, on both <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista </strong>systems.</p>
<p><strong>DON’T DO IT</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1934131245?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1934131245">Mastering Windows Made Easy Training Tutorial v. Vista &amp; XP &#8211; How to use Microsoft Windows Video e Book Manual Guide. Even dummies can learn from this &#8230; through Advanced material from Professor Joe</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1934131245" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/25/tips-3-vistaxp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/24/tips-vistaxp/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/24/tips-vistaxp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CACHE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NETWORK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PERFORMANCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWEAK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DISABLING UNUSED NETWORK CONNECTIONS WILL IMPROVE BOOT TIME
Say you set up a network drive for a network drive for a computer you had months ago but is no longer on your network: When Windows boot, it spends at least some time reconnecting to that drive, wasting precious seconds you could be spending on Facebook. While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">DISABLING UNUSED <strong>NETWORK </strong>CONNECTIONS WILL IMPROVE BOOT TIME</p>
<p>Say you set up a <strong>network drive </strong>for a <strong>network drive</strong> for a <strong>computer </strong>you had months ago but is no longer on your network: When <strong>Windows </strong>boot, it spends at least some time reconnecting to that drive, wasting precious seconds you could be spending on <strong>Facebook</strong>. While <strong>XP </strong>and Vista are better than older versions of <strong>Windows </strong>about<strong> network connections</strong> [who can forget those interminable “Connecting…’ messages?] it still makes sense to disconnect from <strong>network </strong>shares you no longer need. You won’t actually boot noticeably faster without those extra <strong>drive </strong>letters, but Explorer will become usable more quickly after launch. This is especially noticeable in <strong>Vista</strong>, which has a helpful “loading” progress indicator that overlays the address bar: Having any number of network shares will cause it to take any extra 10 to 20 seconds to fully load.</p>
<p><span id="more-117"></span></p>
<p><strong>DO IT </strong>Right-click each shared folder in Explorer and select Disconnect. This will permanently remove them from your drive list unless you map them again.</p>
<p align="center">YOU CAN <strong>TWEAK VIRTUAL MEMORY </strong>SETTINGS FOR IMPROVED <strong>PERFORMANCE</strong></p>
<p>In the <strong>Windows 95/98</strong> era, conventional wisdom held that you should manually set your <strong>virtual memory </strong>[i.e., <strong>pagefile</strong>] size to at least 1.5 times the amount of <strong>RAM </strong>in order to optimize <strong>performance</strong>. [By default, <strong>Windows </strong>will manage <strong>pagefile </strong>on its own: You will likely find the initial <strong>pagefile </strong>size set to 0.5x or 1x the amount of <strong>RAM </strong>you have]. We were skeptical about this tip, but our <strong>benchmarks </strong>surprised us: Some systems showed no change at all, but some(particularly older machines) showed substantial improvement beyond the usual random noise we see in <strong>benchmark </strong>results. We got at least a 10 percent jump after we upped the initial <strong>pagefile </strong>size to 2x amount or <strong>RAM </strong>on two separate machines. It won’t work for all computers, so the jury’s still out on this one, but because it’s so easy to do and there are no negative consequences, it’s worth a shot just to see if it has any effect.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT </strong>In the <strong>XP </strong>System Control Panel, click Advanced, then [under Performance] click Settings, Advanced. In the <strong>Virtual Memory </strong>module, click Change. Click Custom size then up both initial and Maximum size to roughly double your amount of <strong>RAM</strong>. Click Set [important!], then OK out of all windows. In <strong>Vista</strong>’s, click “Advanced system settings” in the System Control Panel and follow the same instructions.</p>
<p align="center">CLEARING THE PREFETCH DIRECTORY [OR <strong>CACHE</strong>] WILL IMPROVE STARTUP TIME</p>
<p>One of the most notorious <strong>Windows </strong>tips ever is that deleting all the files in the Windows/Prefetch directory will cause your system to boot faster. We tested the tip by repeatedly measuring boot times on a trio of both <strong>XP </strong>and <strong>Vista</strong> machines with overstuffed Prefetch folders, then running the same test after clearing the folders out. The result: No improvement in boot time in any of the cases. Some testers have reported that clearing the Prefetch cache actually <em>lengthens </em>boot time, though we didn’t experience this either.</p>
<p><strong>DON’T DO IT</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596527624?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0596527624">Windows Vista Annoyances: Tips, Secrets, and Hacks</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0596527624" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/24/tips-vistaxp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips 2 Vista/XP</title>
		<link>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/24/superfetch-boosts-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/24/superfetch-boosts-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superfetch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chip.revivalx.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vista/XP
SUPERFETCH BOOSTS PERFORMANCE for vista

Superfetch is an update of the XP Prefetcher, designed to more intelligently load applications into RAM based on frequency of use. With Superfetch on, your PC should theoretically get faster over time, particularly when loading frequently apps. You won’t see improvement in general performance, like rendering Photoshop files, but Superfetch does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Vista/XP</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong>SUPERFETCH </strong>BOOSTS PERFORMANCE for <strong>vista</strong></p>
<p align="center">
<p><strong>Superfetch </strong>is an update of the <strong>XP </strong>Prefetcher, designed to more intelligently load applications into <strong>RAM </strong>based on frequency of use. With <strong>Superfetch </strong>on, your <strong>PC </strong>should theoretically get faster over time, particularly when loading frequently apps. You won’t see improvement in general performance, like rendering <strong>Photoshop </strong>files, but <strong>Superfetch</strong> does tend to make apps load10 to 20 percent more quickly, depending on their size.</p>
<p><span id="more-107"></span></p>
<p><strong>DO IT</strong> <strong>Superfetch </strong>is on by default. To ensure that it’s active, go to the Control Panel, open Administrative Tools, and select Services. Scroll down to Superfetch and ensure that it is set to “Started” and “Automatic.”</p>
<p align="center">DISABLING<strong> XP</strong><strong>’s</strong><strong> </strong>INDEXING SERVICE CAN IMPROVE PERFORMANCE</p>
<p>You can almost ignore the question of whether <strong>XP</strong>’s Indexing Service slows down your computer. The fact is it doesn’t do much good anyway. Indexing is supposed to help <strong>Windows </strong>keep better tabs on files, but it does a terrible job of it and offers the users no options for configuring what gets indexed. It’s almost beside the point that it can slow your system-sometimes only a little and sometimes to an outright crawl. Even <strong>Microsoft </strong>acknowledges that the Indexing Services can cause hard drives to thrash and that it “uses lots of pagefile space and lots of CPU time”-in fact, Microsoft oftens recommends disabling it. Note, however,that Vista’s integrated search and indexing system is considerably improved.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT</strong> There are several ways to turn off <strong>XP</strong>’s Indexing Service. The most thorough is to open the Control Panel, open Administrative Tools, then open Services. Scroll down to Indexing Services and double-click it. Change the Startup type to “Disabled.”</p>
<p align="center">TURNING ON MULTIPLE CORES IN<strong> </strong><strong>VISTA</strong><strong> </strong>IMPROVES BOOT TIME</p>
<p>You’ll find an option within <strong>Vista</strong>’s msconfig utility that cryptically lets you set the “Number of <strong>processors</strong>” used during boot. By default it is turned off [with the dropdown set to 1]. We tried upping the setting to 2 on a <strong>dual-core </strong>system and, guess what, no change in boot time whatsoever. Turns out this is just a debug setting for coders who want to test how programs load on single-core machines without having to physically go to a less-sophisticated <strong>PC</strong>.it can be completely ignored. By default <strong>Windows </strong>uses all your cores.</p>
<p align="center">YOU NEED TO OVERWRITE YOUR HAND DRIVE SEVEN TIMES WITH RANDOM DATA TO MAKE DATA UNRECOVERABLE</p>
<p>Conventional wisdom holds that you need to write and rewrite a hard drive numerous times with garbage before it will be totally unrecoverable by forensics experts. That’s not exactly the case: We overwrote a hard drive just once with zeroes and asked the recovery gurus at <strong>DriveSavers </strong>if they could rescue it. The answer: They couldn’t save a single bit. Now we don’t pretend to know about the hardcore resources of groups like the <strong>NSA</strong>, so if you’re that paranoid about being branded a terrorist because of a deleted PDF of <em>The Anarchist’s Cookbook </em>discovered on a used drive you bought on <strong>eBay</strong>, by all means, spend a week wiping that drive. But you’re just casually recycling a drive for resale or donation, a single pass will do the trick and will save you literally days of time waiting for the wipe to finish.</p>
<p><strong>DO IT </strong>Run a program like KillDisk [www.killdisk.com] and select a single zeroes-only pass.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471754218?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=revivproje-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0471754218">Windows Vista For Dummies</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=revivproje-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0471754218" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chip.revivalx.com/2009/08/24/superfetch-boosts-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
